In 2013, two years of Congressional fighting over the budget shut down most federal government operations for sixteen days. Federal employees were told to stay home from work. National parks and museums closed. Students stopped receiving new federal loans.
On October 1, the first day of the shutdown, the federal government’s total debt stood at $16.74 trillion — roughly equal to the nation’s GDP for the entire year, and a nailbiting $25 million away from the statutory debt ceiling at the time. By the end of the 2015 fiscal year, federal government debt was estimated to be $18.2 trillion, with Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid consuming about 47 percent of the entire federal budget.
Four years later, Congress’ approval ratings have dropped, but federal debt hasn’t followed. Entitlement programs continue to eat up a huge piece of the budgetary pie, and we’ll feel the impact more and more, as 77 million baby boomers begin to qualify for Social Security and Medicare. Once the last of the baby boomers retire, the total cost of these programs will be almost four times the size of the entire GDP in 2010. By 2046, projected outlays for mandatory entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, plus interest on the debt, will absorb more revenue than the federal government collects under current tax rates. All other government responsibilities, including national defense, will be paid with borrowed money.
Federal debt this high is not sustainable. It will drive up interest rates for borrowers and curtail economic growth by crowding out private investment. It will put our nation at risk by exposing us to the demands of foreign creditors, who may insist on severe austerity measures as a condition of purchasing more debt. Most importantly, as noted by a 2010 Council on Foreign Relations report, “the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency has become a key facet of US power, allowing the United States to borrow effortlessly and sustain an assertive foreign policy.” Over time, spiraling debt will deprive the federal government of the resources it needs to invest in national priorities and respond to new challenges, from natural disasters to threats against national security.
Reducing annual deficits and federal debt in a bipartisan way has eluded elected officials for decades. Opinion surveys routinely find that over 80 percent of Americans think it is extremely important or very important to reduce federal budget deficits, but concern never translates into sustained public pressure.
These principles should guide our efforts to manage our national debt in a way that makes broad economic sense:
- Uncontrolled growth in federal debt is a serious threat both to our economic stability and our national security, for our generation, for our children, and for our grandchildren.
- Long-term reduction of federal debt requires a comprehensive plan to stabilize debt as a share of GDP, implemented gradually over time to minimize the impact on economic growth.
- A comprehensive plan must address every area of the federal budget without exception, including defense spending, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and operations of the federal government. Eliminating business subsidies will reduce the level of federal debt.
- Long-term debt reduction also requires changes to the Internal Revenue Code to broaden the tax base, eliminate all but selected tax expenditures, and raise revenue to reduce both annual deficits and the federal debt.
- Curtailing the growth of federal debt is consistent with protecting the needs of citizens who are truly disadvantaged. We can refine and preserve benefits for the people who need them most.
Published: August 14, 2017
To Learn More
How Dangerous is U.S. Government Debt? by Francis E. Warnock (Council on Foreign Relations, June 9, 2010)